134 Ind. App. 67 - Stine v. SHUTTLE’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably Zweibon v. Mitchell (1975), Casselman v. State (1985)
2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Melton v. Rickman · Gregory v. State ex rel. Gudgel · Efroymson v. Smith · Melton v. . Rickman · Steve v. Colosimo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"It is ... a general rule of law that a process or warrant not void on its face issued by a tribunal having general jurisdiction of the subject matter is a protection to the officer executing it, and the officer is not required to look beyond the process or warrant or determine the va lidity or regularity of the proceedings on which it is founded, or to exercise his judgment touching its validity in a point of law .... Even though a process may have been issued irregularly by a party who might be liable, it is nevertheless a protection to the officer executing it. See Vol. 35, C.J.S., pp. 539-540. (It is only where a process is void on its face that the arresting officer is not protected. Vol. 85, C.J.S., p. 541." 134 Ind. App. at 74 , 186 N.E.2d at 172 .”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“[I]t is well settled that [a municipal corporation] is not liable for the acts of its officers in attempting to enforce police regulations, as such regulations are not made or enforced in the interest, of the local corporation in its private capacity but in the interests of the public. See Mayne v. Curtis, Rec. (1920), (T.D.), 73 Ind.App. 640, 647 , 126 N.E. 699 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It is the general rule of law that a tort action for... false imprisonment, is based upon deprivation of one’s liberty without legal process that may arise when arrest or detention is without warrant or a warrant that charges no offense ... and all that must be averred or shown [is] the deprivation of one’s liberty without legal process. [Citations omitted.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.