Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 KAN 849 - Reed v. Thomas

Reed v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
March 1972
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 1972

10 state decisions

5019321940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harrison v. Henderson · Bentley, Hatfield & Bentley v. Brown · Dolman v. Kaw Construction Co. · Dettmer v. Fulls · Clark v. Marbourg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The bare statement of a balance due, if accepted as correct, may constitute an account stated, even if it is not accompanied by an account of the items, under the rule that if a fixed and certain sum is admitted to be due for which an action would lie, that will be evidence to support a claim on an account stated.” (Syl. ¶1.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.