Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 KY 175 - Hughes v. Saffell

Hughes v. Saffell’s Empirical Analysis

1909

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2011
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2011

8 state decisions

40190919101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barnett v. Bull · Watkins v. Northern Coal & Coke Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the judgment is void, it is a nullity, and, if it is a nullity, it may be set aside upon motion in the court which entered it. This was always the common law rule.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.