In re Mitchell-Borne Const. Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1914
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 1968
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Macready v. Schenck · McNair v. Gourrier · State ex rel. Dubuisson v. Judge of the Second District Court · Notrebe v. McKinney · Pratt v. McHatton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Articles 109 and 133 of the Constitution of 1898 provide that district courts shall have jurisdiction 'of all proceedings for the appointment of receivers or liquidators to corporations or partnerships.’ By Act 159 of 1898, the Legislature provided rules for the appointment of receivers to corporations, but has not as yet provided rules for the appointment of receivers or liquidators to partnerships. In the absence of definite rules, the courts seem to have followed the equity practice relating to the appointment of receivers to partnerships.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sklar v. Kahle
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.