Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 Md. 572 - McComas v. Wiley

McComas v. Wiley’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
4
states following
January 1954
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 1954

14 state decisions

10019191920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harris v. Hipsley · Redwood v. Howison · McComas v. Wiley · Vogel v. Turnt · Wallace v. Du Bois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Opinion testimony, which is based upon the conclusions or inferences of other witnesses, is not admissible. ...””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.