In re McClelland’s Empirical Analysis
1929
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 1952
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Peck v. . Sherwood · In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Stiles · 9 Mills Surr. 434 - In re the Estate of Brown · 7 Mills Surr. 10 - In re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of Meuschke · In re the Estate of Hembury
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“These two enactments, respecting the widow's exemptions and her quarantine rights, have existed side by side for upwards of twenty years, and whereas in certain cases they may give parallel and overlapping rights, it is not within the province of the Court to decide that either is rendered nugatory by reason of the presence of the other.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.