Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 MOAPP 193 - Fabien v. Grabow

Fabien v. Grabow’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
April 1928
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bateson v. Clark · Shaffer v. Detie · Ewing v. Donnelly · 99 Mo. App. 294 - Heman v. Larkin · Carpenter v. Roth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule that the court takes no notice of fractions of days is subject to exceptions, and when it is essential to justice to determine the priority of acts done on the same day, courts will receive evidence on the issue. (Kimm v. Osgood, supra; 8 Am. and Eng. Ency. Law [2 ed.], 742. The burden of proof rests on the party who asserts an act or event occurred prior to some other which happened on the same day, to establish what he alleges. (Levy v. Bank, 158 Ill. App. 88 , 103.)””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.