Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 NH 493 - Morancy v. Morancy

Morancy v. Morancy’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

84
cited by 84 later decisions
3
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 53 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently September 2023 · most notably Twyman v. Twyman (1993), Steir v. Girl Scouts of the USA (2004)

11 federal appellate · 53 district · 16 state decisions

2801991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hamberger v. Eastman · Plante v. Engel · Jarvis v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America · Thorpe v. State · Morency v. Plourde

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the defendant intentionally or recklessly inflicted severe emotional distress or was certain or substantially certain that such distress would result from his conduct, Restatement (Second) of Torts § 46, Comment i; (2) the conduct was so ‘extreme and outrageous’ as to exceed ‘all possible bounds of decency’ and must be regarded as ‘atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community,’ Restatement (Second) of Torts § 46, Comment d; (3) the actions of the defendant caused the plaintiff’s emotional distress; and (4) the emotional distress suffered by the plaintiff was ‘severe’ so that ‘no reasonable man could be expected to endure it.’ Restatement (Second) of Torts § 46, Comment j.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “One who by extreme and outrageous conduct intentionally or recklessly causes severe emotional distress to another is subject to liability for such emotional distress, and if bodily harm to the other results from it, for such bodily harm.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.