Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 N.J. 96 - Gilbert Spruance Co. v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n.

Gilbert Spruance Co. v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n.’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

142
cited by 142 later decisions
7
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 41 district · 70 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 142 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Li Fu v. Hong Fu (1999), Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. (1997)

16 federal appellate · 41 district · 70 state decisions

910199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morton International, Inc. v. General Accident Insurance · Commonwealth v. McGrogan · State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Estate of Simmons · 218 N.J. Super. 516 - Broadwell Realty Services, Inc. v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of NY · 383 Pa. Super. 558 - Lower Paxon Township v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 142 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) the place of contracting, (b) the place of negotiation of the contract, (c) the place of performance, (d) the location of the subject matter of the contract, and (e) the domicil, residence, nationality, place of incorporation and place of business of the parties.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(a) the needs of the interstate and international systems, (b) the relevant policies of the forum, (c) the relevant policies of other interested states and the relative interests of those states in the determination of the particular issue, (d) the protection of justified expectations, (e) the basic policies underlying the particular field of law, (f) certainty, predictability and uniformity of result, and (g) ease in the determination and application of the law to be applied.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the parties understood was to be the principal location of the insured risk, unless some other state has a more significant relationship”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.