State v. Lujan’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2023
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Zurla v. State · Salandre v. State · State v. Plouse · State v. Grissom
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]here a mechanism exists to bring a defendant to trial, the [s]tate has a duty to use it.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gallegos · State v. Maddox“The right to a speedy trial is intended to prevent or minimize three types of prejudice to a defendant: (1) oppressive pretrial incarceration, (2) anxiety and concern, and (3) the possibility' of impairment to the defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Maddox“we consider that the delay the law can tolerate in the prosecution of a simple crime is considerably less than can be tolerated for a serious. complex crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Maddox
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.