Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 N.M. 388 - State v. Pierce

State v. Pierce’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

29 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · State v. Attaway · State v. Flores · State v. Anderson · State v. PAUL T.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the individual characteristics of the defendant, the circumstances of the detention, and the manner in which the police requested consent.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Police may initiate a protective patdown search for weapons if they have specific and articulable facts which they contend support their assessment of danger. The search must be limited to that which is necessary for the discovery of weapons which might be used to harm the officer or others nearby. A Terry search may not be expanded without probable cause into a search for evidence of a crime. If a protective search goes beyond that which is necessary to determine whether weapons are present, the fruits of the search are suppressed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.