State v. Andazola’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably State v. Bernal (2006), State v. Martinez (2007)
38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Gomez · Swafford v. State · State v. Mora · State v. Jacobs · United States v. Pearson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Distinctness may also be established by the existence of an intervening event, the defendant's intent as evinced by his or her conduct and utterances, the number of victims, and the behavior of the defendant between acts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Contreras“include the separation between the illegal acts by either time or physical distance, the quality and nature of the individual acts, and the objectives and results of each act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Contreras“whether the legislature intended multiple punishments for the unitary conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Contreras
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.