White v. . Eiseman’s Empirical Analysis
1892
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 2 district · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently March 1975 · most notably Carnegie Trust Co. v. First National Bank (1915), 36 Wash. 2d 394 - Rathke v. Griffith (1950)
7 federal appellate · 2 district · 17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on F. M. B., of K. v. . B. D. Bk. · First Nat. Bank of Jersey City v. . Leach · President & Directors of the Manhattan Co v. Laimbeer · Durant v. . Abendroth · Van Ingen v. . Whitman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ The more recent cases regard the statute as remedial in nature, and, looking to substance rather than form, protect those who in good faith substantially comply with the essential requirements.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Crehan v. Megargel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.