134 Ohio App. 3d 464 - State v. Price’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 district · 35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently September 2025 · most notably State v. Sharpe (2008), State v. McLemore (2012)
2 district · 35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Payton v. New York · Johnson v. United States · Mincey v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although there is no precise list of all the exigent circumstances that might justify a warrantless search, exigent circumstances generally must include the necessity for immediate action that will `protect or preserve life or avoid serious injury,' Mincey v. Arizona (1978), 437 U.S. 385 , 392 , 98 S.Ct. 2408 , 2413 , 57 L.Ed.2d 290 , 300 , or will protect a governmental interest that outweighs the individual's constitutionally protected privacy interest, see [United States v.] Rohrig [(C.A.6, 1996)], 98 F.3d [1506] at 1517-1518.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“"(a) [a] search incident to a lawful arrest; (b) consent signifying waiver of constitutional rights; (c) the stop-and-frisk doctrine; (d) hot pursuit; (e) probable cause to search, and the presence of exigent circumstances; * * * (f) the plain view doctrine[;] or (g) an administrative search[.]" (Quotations and citations omitted.) Price , 134 Ohio App.3d at 467 .”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“In the absence of a warrant or consent, the entrance of a police officer into a private home is presumptively unreasonable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.