Schwartz v. Owens’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915
Relies on Herrera v. Collins · Connecticut Board of Pardons v. Dumschat · McGore v. Wrigglesworth · Krystkowiak v. W.O. Brisben Companies, Inc. · People Ex Rel. Dunbar v. DISTRICT CT., TWENTIETH JD
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“even assuming that it was improper for the trial court to dismiss plaintiff's complaint sua sponte here, our own review of the statutory framework demonstrates that there was no possibility that this suit could go forward.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Marks v. Gessler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.