Waneka v. Clyncke’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2025
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Colorado Water Conservation Board v. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District · Armintrout v. People · Corsentino v. Cordova · Pierson v. Black Canyon Aggregates, Inc. · Carlson v. Ferris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where the word 'and is used inadvertently and the intent or purpose of the statute seems clearly to require the word 'or, this is an example of a drafting error which may properly be rectified by a judicial construction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Krol v. CF & I Steel“When interpreting a statute, a reviewing court may substitute 'or' for 'and,' or vice versa, to avoid an absurd or unreasonable result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.