Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 Pa. Super. 488 - Commonwealth v. Wiswesser

134 Pa. Super. 488 - Commonwealth v. Wiswesser’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
5
states following
November 1993
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently November 1993

11 state decisions

501938194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Nye · Smith v. Commonwealth · 113 Pa. Super. 598 - Com. of Pa. v. Fahey · Stabler v. Commonwealth · Commonwealth v. Randolph

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The venire issued by the court is a summons and he becomes a juror the moment his name is dropped from the jury wheel. He is then a juror summoned, by authority of the court, for jury duty. It is true that the law provides a method by which the jurors are notified that they are chosen, but this is but a provision showing how the juror shall be notified, and at that not an exclusive method. * * * When the juror’s name is dropped from the wheel and he is thus chosen with others for jury service, he is a summoned juror as that term is used in the statute defining embracery. He has not been served as required by statute but he has been summoned.” Com. v. Wiswesser, 134 Pa.Super. 488 , 3 A.2d 983, 985 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.