Whyel v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1931
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2005
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boley v. Daniel · Holmberg v. Hardee Trustees · Pinney v. Pinney · Terra Ceia Estates v. Taylor · Consolidated Naval Stores Co. v. Wilson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No claim by subrogation ... to ... the remedies enjoyed by a creditor for the collection of his demand, can be enforced, until the whole demand of the creditor has been satisfied....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.