Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 SO2D 38 - Isaac v. State

Isaac v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 1989
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 1989

6 state decisions

30196119701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 95 So. 2d 589 - Jalbert v. State · State Ex Rel. Interlandi v. Petteway · Hughes v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The crimes set forth in Chapter 810, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., although not all burglary under the common law, have been considered for many years as a species of burglary. State ex rel. Interlandi v. Petteway, 1934, 114 Fla. 850 , 155 So. 319 ." "A charge of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony necessarily includes as a lesser offense a violation of Section 810.05, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. Jalbert v. State, Fla. 1957, 95 So.2d 589 ."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"810.05 Breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor. — (1) Whoever breaks and enters, or enters without breaking, any dwelling, storehouse, building, ship, vessel, aircraft, or railroad car with intent to commit a misdemeanor shall be guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in § 775.082, § 775.083, or § 775.084."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The character of the offense is determined by the nature of the punishment; the maximum punishment to which accused is liable to be subjected is the test by which the degree of the crime must be determined.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.