Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 SO2D 381 - Batiste v. Brown

Batiste v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 1991
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 1991

10 state decisions

801961197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 102 So. 2d 259 - Sewell v. Sharp · Burge v. Administrator, Division of Employment Security of the Department of Labor · Chapman v. Division of Emp. SEC. of Dept. of Labor · In re U. S. Gypsum Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘Misconduct which will deprive an employee of unemployment compensation requires more than mere inefficiency or unsatisfactory conduct, or a failure in good performance as the result of inability or incapacity, or errors in judgment or discretion committed in good faith. Such misconduct is not shown by a single dereliction or minor and casual acts of negligence or carelessness, or by inadvertencies or ordinary negligence in isolated instances,’ 81 C.J.S. Social Security and Public Welfare § 162, pp. 246-247.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “if by direct proof or as an inference from the circumstances it appears that an employee's violations of rules, causing his discharge, were the result of thoughtlessness or inadvertence, he is not guilty of willful misconduct rendering him ineligible for unemployment benefits,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “an act of wanton or willful disregard of the employer's interests, a deliberate violation of the employer's rules, and a disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has a right to expect of his employees.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.