Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 So. 2d 547 - Kovens v. Bluestone

134 So. 2d 547 - Kovens v. Bluestone’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 1969
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jette v. Harbison · Kovens v. Bluestone

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is contended that to all intents and purposes, the note in question made the wife and her property liable for the debt in question. “We do not think there is any merit to this contention. Section 1, Article XI of the Constitution sets out in terms the requirement necessary to bind the property of a married woman to pay her husband’s debt. It cannot be done by a plain promissory note but must be done by an instrument in writing, executed according to the law respecting conveyances of married Women.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Separate property not subject to husband’s debts.- — All property, real and personal, of a wife owned by her before marriage, or lawfully acquired afterward by gift, devise, bequest, descent, or purchase, shall be her separate property, and the same shall not be liable for the debts of her husband without her consent given by some instrument in writing executed according to the law respecting conveyances by married women.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.