134 So. 3d 156 - State v. Sigue’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Padilla v. Kentucky · Baskett v. United States · 769 So. 2d 1158 - State v. Guzman · Baker v. Wade · State v. Ingram
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“La.R.S. 15:529.1(D)(l)(b) states that “any challenge to a previous conviction which is not made before sentence is imposed may not thereafter be raised to attack the sentence.” Here, Defendant did not raise his argument in his written “Objection To Multiple Offender Bill” or at the habitual offender hearing. As such, Defendant failed to preserve the issue for appeal. See [State v.] Elie, [ 10-1494 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/5/11) ,] 74 So.3d 1216 [, writ denied, 11-2786 (La.4/13/12), 85 So.3d 1246 ], State v. Jones, 11-649 (La.App. 4 Cir. 10/19/11) , 76 So.3d 608 , writ denied, 11-2545 (La.3/30/12), 85 So.3d 116 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.