Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

134 So. 3d 396

Dickens v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 21, 2013

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 2013-06-21

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 2017

2 state decisions

Relies on Gargis v. State · Sykes v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2013-06-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PARKER, Justice.

¶1WRIT DENIED. NO OPINION.

STUART, BOLIN, SHAW, and MAIN, JJ., concur.MOORE, C.J., and MURDOCK, WISE, and BRYAN, JJ., dissent.
WISE, Justice

¶2(dissenting).

¶3For the reasons set forth in my dissent in Sykes v. State, 25 So.3d 485, 485 (Ala. Crim.App.2009), while I was serving as the presiding judge on the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, and in then Presiding Judge Baschab’s dissent in Gargis v. State, 998 So.2d 1092, 1100 (Ala.Crim.App.2007), which I joined, I respectfully dissent from the denial of certiorari review in this case.

/134/so3d/396 · .json · Public domain