Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

134 So. 3d 559

MacDonald v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2014-03-14

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 2015

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2014-03-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the trial court’s order denying Thomas MacDonald’s motion seeking additional jail credit filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Our affir-mance is without prejudice for MacDonald to file a motion complying with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. If MacDonald chooses to file a rule 3.801 motion, it must comply with the requirements outlined in rule 3.801(b), (c) and (e) as well as rule 3.850(n). Upon receipt of a rule 3.801 motion, the trial court must follow the procedure outlined in rule 3.850(f). See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.801(e) (effective July 1, 2013). MacDonald must file his motion on or before July 1, 2014. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.801(b) (effective December 5, 2013).

¶2AFFIRMED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

TORPY, C.J., ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
/134/so3d/559 · .json · Public domain