Mosby v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 742 So. 2d 1140 - Daniels v. State · 735 So. 2d 432 - Veasley v. State · 823 So. 2d 582 - Johnson v. State · 895 So. 2d 882 - Brown v. Denson · Moses v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t is possible to commit an unlawful touching without committing sexual battery. And where sufficient evidence exists to support separate and distinct acts of fondling and sexual battery, separate indictable charges can properly stand without implicating jeopardy issues. This is so even if the criminal acts are closely connected or based on a common nucleus of fact....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.