Cate v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4241
Relies on Pate v. Robinson · Ex Parte United Service Stations, Inc. · 52 Ala. App. 422 - Pierce v. State · Pierce v. State · 53 Ala. App. 581 - Edgerson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Petition for the Writ of Mandamus ‘“Mandamus is a drastic and extraordinary writ' that will be issued only when there is: 1) a clear legal right in the petitioner to the order sought; 2) an imperative duty upon the respondent to perform, accompanied by a refusal to do so; 3) the lack of another adequate remedy; and 4) properly invoked- jurisdiction of the court. Ex parte AmSouth Bank, N.A., 589 So.2d 715 (Ala.1991); Ex parte Day, 584 So.2d 493 (Ala.1991).’ “Ex parte United Serv. Stations, Inc., 628 So.2d 501, 503 (Ala.1993).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.