134 S.W. 705
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided February 15, 1911
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1911-02-15
<p>Ceiminal Law (§ 1094*) — Appeal — Statement oe Facts — Necessity.</p> <p>Where the record on á criminal appeal contains no statement of facts or bill of exceptions, the judgment will be affirmed.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2807, 3204; Dec. Dig. § 1094.*]</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1911-02-15
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 2023
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1This conviction was for robbery; the punishment being assessed at 15 years’ confinement in the penitentiary.
¶2The record is before hs without a statement of the facts or bills of exceptions. The only ground of the motion for new trial is based upon the statement that the verdict and judgment are contrary to law and the evidence. The record, as above stated, being before us without the facts adduced on the trial of the case, this alleged error cannot be reviewed.
¶3The judgment is affirmed.