Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 SW3D 459 - In Re Chu

In Re Chu’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Walker v. Packer · CSR LTD. v. Link · In Re CSX Corp. · In Re American Optical Corp. · In Re Masonite Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We do not consider arguments in a petition for writ of mandamus which were not presented to the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.