Bounds v. O'BRIEN’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1) This state: (a) Is the home state of the child at the time of commencement of the proceeding; or (b) Had been the child’s home state within six months before commencement of the proceeding and the child is absent from this state for any reason, and a parent or person acting as parent continues to live in this state; or (2) It is in the best interest of the child that a court of this state assume jurisdiction because: (a) The child and his parents, or the child and at least one litigant, have a significant connection with this state; and (b) There is available in this state substantial evidence concerning the child’s present or future care, protection, training, and personal relationships; or (3) The child is physically present in this state and: (a) The child has been abandoned; or (b) It is necessary in an emergency to protect the child because he has been subjected to or threatened with mistreatment or abuse, or is otherwise being neglected; or (4)It appears that no other state would have jurisdiction under prerequisites substantially in accordance with subdivision (1), (2), or (3), or another state has declined to exercise jurisdiction on the ground that this state is the more appropriate forum to determine the custody of the child, and it is in the best interest of the child that this court assume jurisdiction.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. In Re Marriage of Miller and Sumpter · Krasinski v. Rose

2. “The fact that his parents both reside here cannot, by itself, constitute a `significant connection' for purpose of our analysis because if it was, jurisdiction could be predicated on this ground in virtually any case where one parent was a resident.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF SOC. SERV. v. Hudson

3. “[v]irtually no current information about the child, his development or his personal relationships can be found in Missouri.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF SOC. SERV. v. Hudson