Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 SW3D 706 - State v. Jones

State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wardius v. Oregon · State v. Purlee · State v. Parker · State v. Roberts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This is because the trial court has observed the complained of incident and is in a better position than is an appellate court to determine what, prejudicial effect, if any, the alleged error had-on the jury. An abuse of discretion is found when the trial court’s ruling is clearly against the .logic of the circumstances then before it and when the ruling is so arbitrary and unreasonable as to shock one’s sense of justice and indicate a lack of careful consideration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] trial court has the authority to direct the exclusion of witnesses so that they will not be privy to testimony provided by other witnesses”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.