Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 U.S. 372 - Thomas v. Loney

Thomas v. Loney’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 8 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2025 · most notably Arizona v. United States (2012), Arizona v. United States (2012)

1 federal appellate · 8 district · 13 state decisions

5018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Royall · Ex parte Siebold · Thomas Moore v. The People of the State of Illinois · The United States v. John Bailey · The United States v. Peter Marigold

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But the power of punishing a witness for testifying falsely in a judicial proceeding belongs peculiarly to the government in whose tribunals that proceeding is had . . . The administration of justice in the national tribunals would be greatly embarrassed and impeded if a witness testifying before a court of the United States . . . were liable to prosecution and punishment in the courts of the state upon a charge of perjury, preferred by a disappointed suitor or contestant, or instigated by local passion or prejudice. A witness who gives his testimony, pursuant to the constitution and laws of the United States, in a case pending in a court or other judicial tribunal of the United States, whether he testifies in the presence of that tribunal, or before any magistrate or officer (either of the nation or of the state) designated by act of congress for the purpose, is accountable for the truth of his testimony to the United States only;”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.