State v. Armenta’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
61 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably State v. Mendez (1999), State v. O'NEILL (2003)
61 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · State v. Hendrickson · 107 Wash. 2d 1 - State v. Kennedy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`specific and articulable facts giving rise to a reasonable suspicion that the person stopped is, or is about to be, engaged in criminal activity.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“point to specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mendez“he had lost his wallet in Idaho and did not currently have any ID.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Armenta
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.