State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2018
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Wakefield · 108 Wash. 2d 212 - State v. Perkins · 73 Wash. App. 348 - State v. Olson · 33 Wash. App. 258 - State v. Perez · 104 Wash. 2d 338 - State v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`[Smith] has reserved the right to appeal the court's ruling on the pretrial motion.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Smith · State v. Neff“`a right to appeal a determination of guilt after a trial.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Smith · State v. Neff“creates a strong presumption that the [waiver] is voluntary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Neff
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.