State v. Pittman’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
February 2011
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Keeble v. United States · 127 Wash. 2d 322 - State v. McFarland · 123 Wash. 2d 641 - State v. Hill · Banks v. Privonka
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Q. Wouldn't you have told [Cline] you can charge [Pittman] with trespass instead? A. Well, I felt he was a victim of a possible attempted burglary, and I want somebody charged with the crime that they committed. Q. Well, he committed a trespass, didn't he? A. I also believe he committed an attempted burglary. . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Pittman“A person commits the crime of attempted residential burglary when, with intent to commit that crime, he or she does any act which is a substantial step toward the commission of that crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Pittman“[10] The State agreed the instruction was defective but argued the instructions as a whole properly defined conspiracy. The Supreme Court disagreed because the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Pittman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.