134 Wis. 2d 66 - State v. Stoehr’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
66 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County (2004), State v. Arias (2008)
66 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Morissette v. United States · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Bouie v. City of Columbia · Lambert v. People of the State of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a reasonable construction of the evidence will support the defendant's theory 'viewed in the most favorable light it will reasonably admit of from the standpoint of the accused.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“that D'Jango sat passively. Having reviewed the squad video, I agree that it is not apparent that D'Jango ever sat passively. The majority states that it does not address whether the dog alerted or whether there was probable cause because the issues were not presented to the circuit court and because they were not certified questions. When this court grants direct review upon certification, it acquires jurisdiction”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[w]hen the legislature's goal is primarily to regulate, to accomplish a social good, or to obtain a high standard of care, proof of a criminal state of mind is often eliminated to achieve the desired result.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.