Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 W. Va. 357 - State v. Johnson

134 W. Va. 357 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably 148 W. Va. 465 - Pyles v. Boles (1964), 168 W. Va. 615 - State v. Knight (1981)

2 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

601950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 133 W. Va. 584 - State v. Lewis · State v. Schnelle · Jones v. Commonwealth · 129 W. Va. 366 - State v. Crummitt · 133 W. Va. 394 - State v. Hamilton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “check[s] or hamper[s] the action of the officer,”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Any person who by threats, menaces, acts or otherwise, shall forcibly or illegally hinder, obstruct, or oppose, or attempt to obstruct or oppose, or shall counsel, advise or invite others to hinder, obstruct or oppose any officer in this State (whether civil or military) in the lawful exercise or discharge of his official duty, shall, for every such offense, be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not less than fifty nor more than five hundred dollars, and may, in the discretion of the court, be imprisoned not exceeding one year.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.