Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 135 A3D 282 - Wheeler v. State

Wheeler v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
4
states following
September 2021
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Franks v. Delaware · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Boyd v. United States · Sedillo v. United States · Arizona v. Gant

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[A] computer search may be as extensive as reasonably required to locate the items described in the warrant' based on probable cause.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Some irrelevant files may have to be at least cursorily perused to determine whether they are within the authorized search ambit.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"for purposes of the constitutional particularity requirement, personal electronic devices are more akin to the 'place' to be searched than to the 'thing' to be seized and examined. Concomitantly, that requires that the search of that 'place' be limited to the 'thing(s)'-the digital data-for which there is probable cause to search."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.