Silver v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 district · 12 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “'When the urgent and agonizing nature of the numerous proceedings affecting custody is taken into consideration, with the resulting detriment to the [child] involved, it is apparent that the ultimate remedy available to petitioner by way of appeal is neither plain, speedy, nor adequate.’ ’’) (quoting Silver v. Rose, 135 Ariz. 339, 343 , 661 P.2d 189, 193 (App. 1982)). 2 . Grandparents have visitation rights in Arizona.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Finck v. Superior Court

2. “(a) [Parties]. Any person who previously could institute an application for a writ of mandamus, prohibition, or certio-rari may institute proceedings for a special action. The complaint shall join as a defendant the body, officer, or person against whom relief is sought. If any public body, tribunal, or officer is named as a defendant, the real party or parties in interest shall also be joined as defendants.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Murphy v. Town of Chino Valley

3. “We hold ... that unless the court finds the children to be 'dependent, neglected, incorrigible or delinquent,’ subject matter jurisdiction over them is not established in the juvenile court.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-4997