Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 135 BR 980 - In Re Powers

In Re Powers’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
March 2018
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably In Re Jonathan Barnes Leavitt, Debtor. Jonathan Barnes Leavitt v. Carlos Soto (1999), Eisen v. Curry (1994)

4 federal appellate ·

230199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1307 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157

Relies on Pelaes v. United States · Stoll v. Gottlieb · Lawrence v. United States · Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles · Albany Partners Ltd Albany Partners Ltd v. Wp Westbrook Albany Partners Ltd Wp Westbrook Ww C

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A bankruptcy court must impose sanctions when it finds a violation of Bankruptcy Rule 9011”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[N]either malice nor actual fraud is required to find a lack of good faith. The bankruptcy judge is not required to have evidence of debtor illwill directed at creditors, or that debtor was affirmatively attempting to violate the law — malfeasance is not a prerequisite to bad faith.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “misrepresented facts in his [petition or] plan, unfairly manipulated the Bankruptcy Code, or otherwise [filed] his Chapter 13 [petition or] plan in an inequitable manner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.