135 Cal. App. 2d 82 - Kading v. Willis’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
September 1966
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 25 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Zuckerman v. Underwriters at Lloyd's · 35 Cal. 2d 474 - Ornales v. Wigger · 45 Cal. 2d 30 - Hilyar v. Union Ice Co. · Tabata v. Murane · Conroy v. Perez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““148. Care Required for Safety of Child. “Ordinarily it is necessary to exercise greater caution for the protection and safety of a young child than for an adult person who possesses normal physical and mental facilities. One dealing with children must anticipate the ordinary behavior of children. The fact that they usually cannot and do not exercise the same degree of prudence for their own safety as adults, that they often are thoughtless and impulsive, imposes a duty to exercise a proportional vigilance and caution on those dealing with children, and from whose conduct injury to a child might result.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The rule now generally accepted in this state and elsewhere is that the operator of a motor vehicle who is or should be cognizant of the proximity of children must exercise ordinary care to discover their presence upon or near his vehicle and upon such discovery to use ordinary care to avoid inflicting injury upon them * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.