135 Cal. App. 4th 952 - Endres v. Moran’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 7 Cal. 4th 503 - Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd. · 24 Cal. 4th 1122 - Ketchum v. Moses · 93 Cal. App. 4th 993 - ComputerXpress, Inc. v. Jackson · 187 Cal. App. 3d 299 - Malmstrom v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. · 101 Cal. App. 4th 211 - Pfeiffer Venice Properties v. Bernard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The possible recovery against defendants did not change [as a result of bringing the anti-SLAPP motion]. The factual allegations which defendants had to defend did not change. The work involved in trying the case did not change. Defendants’ burden concerning their jurisdictional defense did not change. The case was essentially the same after the ruling on the special motion to strike as it was before. The results of the motion were minimal and insignificant, fully justifying the court’s finding that defendants should not recover fees.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.