135 Conn. App. 381 - In Re Nicholas B.’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2025
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In re Alexander V. · 125 Conn. App. 601 - Keating v. Ferrandino · 111 Conn. App. 500 - In Re Justice V. · 95 Conn. App. 826 - Baker v. Baker · Esposito v. Banning
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he major deficiencies in the presentation of this claim, which undeniably interfere with the petitioners' right to respond adequately to the claim, fall well outside of that degree of latitude afforded self-represented parties”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Traylor v. State“argument is devoid of any legal analysis, let alone citation to any authority,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Traylor v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.