Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

135 F. 1021

Docket No. 14.

In re Mandel

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1905.)

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1905-03-20

<p>Petition for Revision of Proceedings of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York, in Bankruptcy.</p>

1 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1905-03-20

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 1979

7 federal appellate · 7 district ·

9019051910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Petition for Revision of Proceedings of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York, in Bankruptcy.

¶2E. Eschwege, for petitioner. W. Lesser, for respondent

¶3Before LACOMBE,. TOWNSEND, and COXE, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM,

¶5Order of District Court (127. Fed. 863) affirmed.

/135/f1d/1021 · .json · Public domain