Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

135 F.2d 209

Docket No. 8145.

Bobrow Bros. v. Commissioner

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued April 21, 1943.

Decided April 23, 1943.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1943-04-23

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 1963

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1943-04-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Leonard J. Schwartz, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Jerome J. Rothschild and Fox, Rothschild, O’Brien & Frankel, all of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner.

¶2Arthur Manella, of Washington, D. C. (Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., on the brief), for respondent.

¶3Before MARIS and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges, and GANEY, District Judge.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5For the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion of the Board of Tax Appeals the decision of the Board upon the right of the petitioner to deduct as taxes certain import duties in computing its income tax for the year 1936 is affirmed. The decision, however, includes an adjudication of the petitioner’s liability for undistributed profits tax for the same year which may be affected by the provisions of Section 501(a) (3) of the Revenue Act of 1942, 26 U.S.C. A. Int.Rev.Acts. Accordingly upon the joint motion of the petitioner and the respondent the decision of the Board is vacated and the cause is remanded to the Tax Court of the United States for the determination by it of the application and effect, if any, of the provisions of Section 501 (a) (3) of the Revenue Act of 1942 upon the liability of the petitioner for undistributed profits tax for the year 1936.

/135/f2d/209 · .json · Public domain