Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

135 F.2d 921

Docket No. 10694.

Brown v. Maxwell

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1943.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1943-06-09

2 counsel of record

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1943-06-09

¶1Clyde Eastus, U. S. Atty., of Fort Worth, Tex., L. L. James, Senior Enforcement Atty., OPA, Talbot Smith, Regional Atty., OPA, Amos J. Coffman, Regional Enforcement Atty., OPA and W. B. Harrell, Regional Litigation Atty., OPA, all of Dallas, Tex., and Frank Taylor, State Enforcement Atty., OPA, of Fort Worth, Tex., for appellant.

¶2H. S. Lattimore, of Fort Worth, Tex., for appellee.

¶3Before HUTCHESON, HOLMES, and McCORD, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5In the above numbered and entitled cause comes the appellant, by its counsel, Clyde Eastus, Esq., United States Attorney; Talbot Smith, Esq., Regional Attorney; Amos J. Coffman, Esq., Regional Enforcement Attorney; W. B. Harrell, Esq., Regional Litigation Attorney; L. L. James, Esq., Senior Enforcement Attorney, and Frank Taylor, Esq., District Enforcement Attorney, and the appellee, by his counsel, H. S. Lattimore, Esq., and file a joint stipulation to docket and remand to the trial Court for a new trial the above entitled and numbered cause.

¶6Pursuant to said stipulation, it is ordered and adjudged by this Court that this cause be, and it is hereby, remanded to the said District Court for a new trial in accordance with the agreement and stipulation of counsel.

¶7It is further ordered that the mandate of this court shall issue forthwith.

/135/f2d/921 · .json · Public domain