Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 135 F.3d 1036 - Pendarvis v. Ormet Corp.

Pendarvis v. Ormet Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

135 F.3d 1036 · 1998

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
March 2002
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Caldarera v. Eastern Airlines, Inc. · Hart v. O'Brien · Ham Marine, Inc. v. Dresser Industries, Inc. · Albert Pick & Co. v. Stringer · Florance v. Nixon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is so large as to shock the judicial conscience, so gross or inordinately large as to be contrary to right reason, so exaggerated as to indicate bias, passion, prejudice, corruption, or other improper motive.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A jury's assessment of damages, on the other hand, will only be reversed for clear error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.