135 F.3d 1318 - Keenan v. Hall — 135 F.3d 1318

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently November 2020 · most notably Emmeth Sealey v. Th Giltner (1999), Rezaq v. Nalley (2012)

8 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

¶1Before: SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

¶2ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REJECTING EN BANC REQUEST

¶3ORDER

¶4The opinion, Slip op. 5571, filed May 8, 1996 [83 F.3d 1083] is amended as follows: add a footnote to “major difference between the conditions for the general prison population and the segregated population” in line 2 on page 5578 [83 F.3d at 1089] of the Slip op.: “The Court expressed it thusly: ‘Based on a comparison between inmates inside and outside disciplinary segregation, the State’s actions in placing [Sandin] there for 30 days did not work a major disruption in his environment.’ Sandin at 486,115 S.Ct. at 2301.”

¶5With this change, Judges Schroeder and Fletcher have voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en bane. Judge Rymer voted to grant the petition for rehearing and to accept the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

¶6The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it. Fed. R.App. P. 35(b).

¶7Ihe petition tor rehearing is demed anc the suggestion for rehearing en banc is re jected.