Hess v. Jf Mazurkiewicz’s Empirical Analysis
135 F.3d 905 · 1998
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently October 2016
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Cuyler v. Sullivan · United States v. Pungitore · Government of Virgin Islands v. Zepp · United States v. Moscony
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“need not show that the lapse in representation was so egregious as to violate objective standards for attorney perform-anee,” 135 F.3d at 910 (emphasis added). The District Court, in quoting Hess (but attributing the quote to Gambino), left out the crucial”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“presented a plausible, if ultimately unsuccessful, alibi defense”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.