Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 135 FSUPP2D 917 - United States v. Esterman

United States v. Esterman’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
May 2014
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 982 (§ 1366 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986)

Relies on Lawrence Greebel Richard Crane Brian Robinson John Ann Somers v. Ftp Software Inc · United States of America v. Christian Ubakanma · United States v. Pelullo · United States v. Agne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether a fraud does or does not “affect a financial institution” is a recurring consideration in federal criminal jurisprudence— that phrase makes a difference not only under Section 982(a)(2)(A) but also in statute of limitations terms under Sections 3282 and 3293(2) (under the latter statute, the normal statute of limitations is doubled "if the [wire fraud] offense affects a financial institution”), and the phrase also bears upon the classification of certain offenses for sentencing purposes and Sentencing Guideline considerations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.