Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 135 FSUPP3D 178 - Steinberg v. Mozilo

Steinberg v. Mozilo’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1883 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc. · Aronson v. Lewis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he question . . . is whether the time between demand and filing of suit was sufficient to permit the Board of Directors to discharge its duty to consider the demand.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “entitled to the benefit of the business judgment rule if taken in a manner that was informed and in good faith.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.